top | item 42937832

(no title)

biddit | 1 year ago

You're assessing them with the wrong criteria.

You don't hire architects to execute a demolition and you also don't hire anyone heavily invested in keeping the building standing. But you DO hire people loyal to you to perform the work, who will receive staunch opposition the latter group of people.

discuss

order

throwaway_2494|1 year ago

This is the bit I don't get. Why are there so many people ready to line up to defend the powerful against the weak, the rich against the poor?

What a brave and noble purpose! I'm real proud of people like that...

The richest man on earth in charge of cost cutting. Go and bathe in a jacuzzi of cash Musk, and stop acting like a sore winner...

Hizonner|1 year ago

If you hired Trump's idiots to handle a demolition, they would:

1. Bring the building down on their own heads, with bystanders inside.

2. Destabilize the neighboring buildings to the point where they also had to be demolished.

3. Flood the site and cause a giant gas leak.

dmonitor|1 year ago

4. Use the self-made catastrophe as evidence that more buildings are dangerous and need to be demolished

anigbrowl|1 year ago

It's a mistake to dismiss them all as idiots. MAGA people have very different values from you, and you need to consider the possibility that they are comeptent and malicious.

cantstopmenow|1 year ago

4. Pat yourself on the back while people complaining about egg prices cheer as their kids die of measles.

cantstopmenow|1 year ago

Cool. Now address the fact that all of this is an unconstitutional coup.

gonzoflip|1 year ago

How is the executive branch directing a department under their authority a coup? Please be specific.