(no title)
zlagen | 1 year ago
What are you protecting cloudflare?
Also they show those captchas when going to robots.txt... unbelievable.
zlagen | 1 year ago
What are you protecting cloudflare?
Also they show those captchas when going to robots.txt... unbelievable.
rurp|1 year ago
This hostility to normal browsing behavior makes me extremely reluctant to ever use Cloudflare on any projects.
a_imho|1 year ago
mmh0000|1 year ago
Springtime|1 year ago
I'd presumed it was just the VM they're heuristically detecting but sounds like some are experiencing issues on Linux in general.
nbernard|1 year ago
ponector|1 year ago
ranger_danger|1 year ago
globalnode|1 year ago
sleepybrett|1 year ago
neodymiumphish|1 year ago
lta|1 year ago
anothercoup|1 year ago
[deleted]
fcq|1 year ago
It is either that or keep sending data back to the Meta and Co. overlords despite me not being a Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp user...
ezfe|1 year ago
ATechGuy|1 year ago
nerdralph|1 year ago
fbrchps|1 year ago
Turnstile is the in-page captcha option, which you're right, does affect page load. But they force a defer on the loading of that JS as best they can.
Also, turnstile is a Proof of Work check, and is meant to slow down & verify would-be attack vectors. Turnstile should only be used on things like Login, email change, "place order", etc.
viraptor|1 year ago
jasonjayr|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
potus_kushner|1 year ago
inemesitaffia|1 year ago
progmetaldev|1 year ago
kevincox|1 year ago
For example even Cloudflare hasn't configure their official blog's RSS feed properly. My feed reader (running in a DigitalOcean datacenter) hasn't been able to access it since 2021 (403 every time even though backed off to checking weekly). This is a cachable endpoint with public data intended for robots. If they can't configure their own product correctly for their official blog how can they expect other sites to?
glandium|1 year ago
scarab92|1 year ago
I scrape hundreds of cloudflare protected sites every 15 minutes, without ever having any issues, using a simple headless browser and mobile connection, meanwhile real users get interstitial pages.
It's almost like Cloudflare is deliberately showing the challenge to real users just to show that they exist and are doing "something".
chiefalchemist|1 year ago
kylecazar|1 year ago
trinix912|1 year ago
Somehow, Safari passes it the first time. WTF?
idlephysicist|1 year ago
A cheeky response is "their profit margins", but I don't think that quite right considering that their earnings per share is $-0.28.
I've not looked into Cloudflare much, I've never needed their services, so I'm not totally sure on what all their revenue streams are. I have heard that small websites are not paying much if anything at all [1]. With that preface out of the way–I think that we see challenges on sites that perhaps don't need them as a form of advertising, to ensure that their name is ever-present. Maybe they don't need this form of advertising, or maybe they do.
[1] https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/plans/
tempest_|1 year ago
benbristow|1 year ago
alexjplant|1 year ago
likeabatterycar|1 year ago
It's also a pretty safe assumption that Cloudflare is not run by morons, and they have access to more data than we do, by virtue of being the strip club bouncer for half the Internet.
rurp|1 year ago
lta|1 year ago
johnklos|1 year ago
So it's OK for them to do shitty things without explaining themselves because they "have access to more data than we do"? Big companies can be mysterious and non-transparent because they're big?
What a take!
shwouchk|1 year ago
selfhoster|1 year ago
GGByron|1 year ago