(no title)
ChemSpider | 1 year ago
A new trend I see is that some customers even rule out using EU located servers that are owned/run by US companies (such as the AWS Dublin or Franfurt locations).
ChemSpider | 1 year ago
A new trend I see is that some customers even rule out using EU located servers that are owned/run by US companies (such as the AWS Dublin or Franfurt locations).
croes|1 year ago
A US company has to give access to the data on their servers to the authorities no matter where the servers are located.
They can go to court to prevent it but aren’t allowed to inform their customer.
That violates EU law on multiple levels.
dathinab|1 year ago
yibg|1 year ago
rsynnott|1 year ago
(More likely, there's another round of negotiation, and some new bandaid solution is produced; not like it's the first time. No-one, or almost no-one, really _wants_ this to break down entirely; the fallout would be widespread.)
It does seem reasonable to expect that the rate of companies moving stuff out of US-based infrastructure providers will increase, though; the whole thing is very fragile.
michaelt|1 year ago
Doing without would be extremely painful in the short/medium term.
Of course if you could instead force AWS to sell the EU arm of their business, that would be a different matter...
[1] https://www.fierce-network.com/cloud/european-cloud-players-...
belorn|1 year ago
For a lot of stuff this is process that takes 10+ years. A fairly large step is the time between a EU regulation being created and when the same law is ratified by each country, and the span between those two events where the government seeks input from the industry on how to implement the regulation.
makeitdouble|1 year ago