top | item 42962812 (no title) jonathanrmumm | 1 year ago They developed software as "juniors" in companies—we just don't belittle them by calling them "junior devs". discuss order hn newest svnt|1 year ago Bringing in No True Scotsman doesn’t save the argument.These people were exceptional outcomes, where luck and hubris met sufficient competency. You cannot argue the general case from exceptions. jonathanrmumm|1 year ago If we view the person we are looking to hire as a "junior dev", a "junior dev" is what you will get. But if you seek a young, competent software dev—one you might find.
svnt|1 year ago Bringing in No True Scotsman doesn’t save the argument.These people were exceptional outcomes, where luck and hubris met sufficient competency. You cannot argue the general case from exceptions. jonathanrmumm|1 year ago If we view the person we are looking to hire as a "junior dev", a "junior dev" is what you will get. But if you seek a young, competent software dev—one you might find.
jonathanrmumm|1 year ago If we view the person we are looking to hire as a "junior dev", a "junior dev" is what you will get. But if you seek a young, competent software dev—one you might find.
svnt|1 year ago
These people were exceptional outcomes, where luck and hubris met sufficient competency. You cannot argue the general case from exceptions.
jonathanrmumm|1 year ago