top | item 42983099

(no title)

BlandDuck | 1 year ago

Interesting ideas. I respectfully disagree with all of them.

Do you have any evidence to back them up, or are you yourself "just [...] making things up that sound good" ?

discuss

order

spicyusername|1 year ago

The outcomes of public policy throughout the 1900s, particularly pre-Reagan and post-FDR. Quite expansionary, but nearly all of the bedrock institutions most people have come to rely on and take for granted materialized in this period.

- The GI Bill

- Medicare / Medicaid

- Social Security

- Unemployment Insurance

- Regulatory institutions / policies like the SEC, FDIC, OSHA, and the EPA.

- The Civil Rights Act

None of this stuff just happens by accident, and these kinds of things definitely don't magically fall out of unregulated free-markets. And they DEFINITELY don't fall out of markets where the participants are massive corporate interests.

You need institutions whose focus is solely on social / economic wellbeing and who have the power and authority to provide it.

There are also plenty of modern academics, making things up themselves, who articulate similar points.

- Joseph Stiglitz

- Thomas Piketty

- Ha-Joon Chang

- Mariana Mazzucato

- Robert Reich

- etc

bryanlarsen|1 year ago

Perhaps Friedman's most widely known saying is that "inflation is a monetary phenomenon". In the last 30 years the correlation between money supply expansion and inflation has been low. OTOH the correlation between supply shocks and inflation has been high.

A real science would update in the face of contradictory evidence. Some economists have, but most haven't.

zdragnar|1 year ago

We did see massive inflation in subsectors of the broader economy, though, and there were a lot more monetary policy levers moving than just supply expansion.