(no title)
chychiu | 1 year ago
That said, I think the main reason why SV prefers younger founders is exactly because of their naivety + lack of understanding in their respective domains. E.g. It’s a lot easier for someone who has never worked in healthcare to try to disrupt healthcare, than someone who’s been institutionalised by the system they’re embedded in.
99% of these young founders won’t work out, but occasionally there will be one with a fresh idea that truly disrupts a system and gives the hypergrowth returns that VC guys want
iterateoften|1 year ago
But it works both ways. Having a spouse, kids, obligations can make you hyper focused on providing the best life you can for them.
e40|1 year ago
I was a young founder that turned into an old founder. Same company for 40+ years, no exit. We talked with VCs and potential investors many, many times. Once we were past a certain age, they became much less interested and my take on the reason is:
At a certain point, we had a lot of experience running a company. All parts of it. When we interacted with VCs or potential investors, the things they can pull on a 20 year old were obviously not going to work on us. I'm talking about financial slight of hand, terms in contracts, etc.
As for the disruption, I feel it's not the young that do it. Some companies started from experienced founders who couldn't get it done in their current company and went on to found a new, successful company:
* WhatsApp
* Instagram
* Netflix
* Loudcloud