[ephaeton]

loving he goes 'int main() { ... }' and never returns an int from it. Even better: without extra error / warning flags the compiler will just eat this and generate some code from it, returning ... yeah. Your guess is probably better than mine.

If the uber-bean counter, herald of the language of bean counters demonstrate unwillingness to count beans, maybe the beans are better counted in another way.

[toth]

Well, actually... the "main" function is handled specially in the standard. It is the only one where the return type is not void and you don't need to explicitly return from it - if you do it, it is treated as if you returned 0. (You will most definitely get a compiler error if you try this with any other function.)

You might say this is very silly, and you'd be right. But as quirks of C++ go it is one of the most benign ones. As usual it is there for backwards compatibility.

And, for what it's worth, the uber-bean counter didn't miss a bean here...

[SunlitCat]

To me, it's kinda funny that he starts with

> using namespace std

something you get told not to do easily! :D