top | item 43002016 (no title) kingds | 1 year ago 2200 would improperly add an extra significant figure, "about 2000" would be okay. discuss order hn newest bena|1 year ago I had figured since km/h was NN00, the same would be good for mph. olddustytrail|1 year ago Naw, it's already been false precisioned to hell.The original would have been "about 1000 metres/second". That got translated to 3600 km/h etc.Check how much it charges if it was really 800 m/s. Or 1200 m/s.
bena|1 year ago I had figured since km/h was NN00, the same would be good for mph. olddustytrail|1 year ago Naw, it's already been false precisioned to hell.The original would have been "about 1000 metres/second". That got translated to 3600 km/h etc.Check how much it charges if it was really 800 m/s. Or 1200 m/s.
olddustytrail|1 year ago Naw, it's already been false precisioned to hell.The original would have been "about 1000 metres/second". That got translated to 3600 km/h etc.Check how much it charges if it was really 800 m/s. Or 1200 m/s.
bena|1 year ago
olddustytrail|1 year ago
The original would have been "about 1000 metres/second". That got translated to 3600 km/h etc.
Check how much it charges if it was really 800 m/s. Or 1200 m/s.