(no title)
adeon | 1 year ago
I think I originally read that this happens in a book somewhere, then observed and noticed yeah that seems to be the norm. Not surprised it seems to be same thing in these adjacent metric % headlines where there's no proper thought if there exists a causal link between X and Y.
I think my brain has learned to recognize the pattern "Something rises X% as Thing Happened" and it reminds me of that cheeky quote about how every headline that is in the form of a question is, ... uh I forgot the full quote. But feels like almost this could have some kind of cheeky rule of its own, about how no causal link ever exists in a headline like this.
arrowsmith|1 year ago
Black Swan by Nassim Taleb?
adeon|1 year ago
That book however you mentioned, I just looked it up and it seems interesting. Might put on my read list.