That looks more like a git alias than a job for an entirely new tool, to me. How many of the core functions do you really need to cover before `jj` itself becomes redundant?
I apologize if my sibling comment sounded harsh. I think you were saying that jj could be implemented as some Git aliases. Given the information available in this thread, that might seem reasonable. I didn't realize that this thread did not include a link to the project's docs. Sorry about that.
martinvonz|1 year ago
martinvonz|1 year ago