[roncohen]

It’s in the post :)

> In practice, many teams will use a pull request-based workflow because the tests could be too complicated to run locally or need to facilitate code reviews. For trunk-based development to fulfill its promise, it’s imperative that pull requests are kept small and that the team is committed to reviewing them quickly.

[sebazzz]

Then it is not trunk-based, it is still PR based. I would also wonder how bigger features would get developed, without littering it across multiple pull requests and feature flags to make sure the code still compiles.