I was once offered an engineering manager position at iridium (which i discussed here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41748519)-- that entire company is a race to reduce the bottom line. They offered me (an engineering manager to 5 engineers) a lower salary than I was offered as a new grad. Also their talent pipeline is quite stale, most of the engineers on my prospective team were at the org for 10-20 years. For such an interesting aspect of technology, it's ashame they can't attract more talent, such an untapped market low earth orbit satellite networks are...
harrall|1 year ago
Terrestrial networks in the meantime have only gotten better and improved coverage. Not that many customers, relatively, need satellite comms.
Now SpaceX is eating their lunch.
I don’t think the market for satellite comms has ever been big enough for a pure-satellite company to get enough money to do something cool. SpaceX can afford the R&D because they are a little more diversified.
mschuster91|1 year ago
No surprise, the only usecases back then for the price that Iridium and others commanded were SAR, a few military/secret service style use cases and execs who deem themselves to be of such importance that they need to be reachable on the globe 24/7 even if they are just taking a flight over the Atlantic or on a cruise ship, and Iridium can't be reasonably used for much more than that.
> Now SpaceX is eating their lunch.
Partially due to physics. Latency on Starlink is reportedly low enough to run online games or telephony and the bandwidth high enough to allow for video streaming in the outback, which makes the potential market size muuuuch bigger so the price point can be lowered enough to be competitive with landline DSL of all things.
The problem is, SpaceX isn't something that the US government can rely on forever. For now, its leader is in good standing with the 47th, but that may change overnight (it has happened with either of these characters before and both have quite the large egos that will collide rather sooner than later). And what to do then?
irish_john|1 year ago
morgango|1 year ago
IMHO, the worst places to be are organizations that were supposed to change the world, but didn't, and don't quite get it.
Your experience totally tracks with that.
bathtub365|1 year ago
jandrese|1 year ago
glitchc|1 year ago
moolcool|1 year ago
martinsnow|1 year ago
wcfields|1 year ago