This argument reads like whataboutism. If you believe it's immoral to force Americans to pay for foreign aid then I don't see how the argument "well that money could be spent worse" is valid.
> Two weeks into President Trump’s sweeping freeze on foreign aid, H.I.V. groups abroad have not received any funding, jeopardizing the health of more than 20 million people, including 500,000 children. Subsequent waivers from the State Department have clarified that the work can continue, but the funds and legal paperwork to do so are still missing.
> In children who acquired H.I.V. at birth, the infection can progress very quickly to illness, with death occurring as early as eight to 12 weeks after birth — shorter than the 90-day pause on foreign aid.
So much pain and death will be caused by Trump, Musk, Rubio and their enablers in Congress and at large.
This is unconscionable and evil. Don't ever believe them when they claim to be "pro-life".
[+] [-] ChrisArchitect|1 year ago|reply
Usaid funding freeze disrupts global tuberculosis control efforts
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43038727
[+] [-] WorkerBee28474|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] benatkin|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] smbullet|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dashundchen|1 year ago|reply
> In children who acquired H.I.V. at birth, the infection can progress very quickly to illness, with death occurring as early as eight to 12 weeks after birth — shorter than the 90-day pause on foreign aid.
So much pain and death will be caused by Trump, Musk, Rubio and their enablers in Congress and at large.
This is unconscionable and evil. Don't ever believe them when they claim to be "pro-life".
[+] [-] sebazzz|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] FigurativeVoid|1 year ago|reply
If it was a local government taking that funding instead of using it to treat HIV, we would call it a genocide. They are calling it cost cutting.
[+] [-] throaway2501|1 year ago|reply