[thomasfortes]

Hey, here they are :)

Original vision https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463#comment-95406...

Person with more than 700 packages https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463#comment-95541...

As for the C&D, the github has some issues with Fedora distros and labeled as "Dependency issues" and there's no indication if the user is using the fedora flatpak or the flathub one, so if I had to guess I would guess that they aren't that happy with:

    1. Being asked to fix bugs introduced by downstream.

    2. Having their brand damaged because it isn't clear that the fedora 
       flatpak is a way more limited version than the verified one.

    3. Having their issues with their complaints minimized and ignored by
       the people responsible for the fedora flatpak system.

[adamwill]

The thing about complaints being "minimized and ignored" really isn't true. There is a gigantic thread that's a direct response to their complaints: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463

yes, it recently got unfortunately heated with the whole "whose idea about what to do with Qt is better" argument, but the whole way through that ticket - which was filed 23 days ago, and has had active discussion going that whole time, including being the main topic at multiple workstation WG meetings - it's been pretty clear that the outcome is likely to involve Fedora flatpaks being demoted. The very first post is a proposal - by a key member of the workstation WG - to move flathub ahead of Fedora flatpaks in the precedence order. Consistently through the discussion, catanzaro and other workstation WG members have been supporting that idea, with a lot of discussion and argument about the details, as you always get in F/OSS projects. we do all the sausage factory stuff in the open, that's the point.