[Quarondeau]

I find it more disturbing that her private, offline conversations are being policed at all.

[duxup]

Most of these AI products are online and sent over the network to generate the response.

[Quarondeau]

That's true, but those safeguards can be disabled. ChatGPT on Azure for example, allows Azure account managers to disable filters/safeguards depending on the customer.

Given that this product is apparently used to give people with disabilities a voice, that should definitely qualify. Yes of course they should be able to swear, just like everyone else.

[wrs]

So is iMessage. Putting some processing elsewhere on the network doesn’t change the fact that a conversation between spouses (or any other utterances of a person, for that matter) should be private.

[GJim]

Posts made amongst closed groups of friends on social media are now routinely policed by tech companies for "bad" words.

Frankly, I find it "regarded" such puritanism is tolerated.

[abeppu]

... is it offline? Is the whole product a use-based API (which might be related to why the voice is slow and she doesn't use it that often)?

[DiscourseFan]

"I'm sorry, Karen. I'm afraid I can't do that."