top | item 43065045

(no title)

petschge | 1 year ago

I was referring to the "The US government is trying to bring back nuclear safety employees it fired on Thursday, but is struggling to let them know they should return to work, NBC News has reported. [...]An email obtained by NBC said the letters for some NNSA employees 'are being rescinded, but we do not have a good way to get in touch with those personnel'." part. It's about 300 people affected. And when you apply at these types of positions they ARE aware of private contact information.

discuss

order

teddyh|1 year ago

I really don’t get it. What is the story? Should the employer be shamed for not keeping home/private contact information for all employees? Or is the job of those employees so vital that they could never be considered for firing? The article does not state what their actual occupations are.

dralley|1 year ago

>Or is the job of those employees so vital that they could never be considered for firing? The article does not state what their actual occupations are.

They build, maintain and run security for the US nuclear weapons stockpile. This was, in fact, mentioned in the article.

Quote: "The nuclear security officials who were laid off on Thursday helped oversee the nation's stockpile of nuclear weapons. That included staff who are stationed at facilities where the weapons are built, according to CNN."

Would you agree that this is a job of pretty vital importance?