Of course the more forty year old rules you follow the more engineering it is. Using a better programming language that doesn't depend on organisational process for safety is not engineering - there's no standard for that.
Argument is only that there is a lot of proper engineering in software development - whether it is implementing memory safety by default in new languages or having organizational processes. All is there and I only dislike opinions that say software development is immature new field. It is not.
Article was also about NASA organization rules so pointing to MISRA was argument „it is. It only NASA and those are not so special rules”.
ozim|1 year ago
Argument is only that there is a lot of proper engineering in software development - whether it is implementing memory safety by default in new languages or having organizational processes. All is there and I only dislike opinions that say software development is immature new field. It is not.
Article was also about NASA organization rules so pointing to MISRA was argument „it is. It only NASA and those are not so special rules”.