the IP rights holders have yet to bare their teeth. I don't think the outcome you suggest is clear at all, in fact I think if anything entirely the opposite is the most probable outcome. I've lost count of the number of technology epochs that at the time were either silently or explicitly dependent on ignoring the warez aspects while being blinded by the possibilities, Internet video, music and film all went through this phase. GPTs are just a new medium, and by the end of it royalties will in all likelihood still end up being paid to roughly the same set of folk as beforeI quite like the idea of a future where the AI job holocaust largely never happened because license costs ate up most of the innovation benefit. It's just the kind of regressive greed that keeps the world ticking along and wouldn't be surprised if we ended up with something very close to this
beeflet|1 year ago
Also, the pool of public domain data is always increasing, so the AI will eventually win in any case, even if we have to wait 100 years
bigbones|1 year ago
kragen|1 year ago
tiahura|1 year ago
Ray20|1 year ago
Not quite realistic. You are talking about very huge benefits, in favor of which licenses will be abandoned. And who don't abandoned them... I mean you can look at the Amish settlements.
bigbones|1 year ago
oldpersonintx|1 year ago
[deleted]