(no title)
_fw | 1 year ago
Wi-Fi was a dealbreaker because it was a laptop and it was my only machine. I remember one day booting in the latest live CD that Canonical had sent (way back when you could get them delivered by post), switch on my laptop and seeing those SSIDs appear.
It honestly felt like magic, and I’ll never forget it. Something as mundane as working WiFi drivers on a basic spec Vaio quite literally changed my life, by allowing me to run Linux natively with a web connection. That opened many doors to me later in life.
Forever grateful for that work.
tapoxi|1 year ago
I started using Linux full time again a year ago (Bazzite) after ~15 years away and I'm astonished how much stuff just works now. I can just use Chrome and every website works. My entire Steam library works. I installed this as an experiment but the experience is so damn good these days I haven't had the need or desire to break glass and install Windows.
s0l1dsnak3123|1 year ago
Before I managed to get WiFi working (I had lots of trial and error with ndiswrapper), my very first triumph was getting a USB-powered "winmodem" to work with Damn Small Linux (which I got for free in a magazine). One of the websites I used seems to still be online: http://www.linmodems.org
While I am so thankful that compatibility and ease of use has dramatically improved since those heady days, I honestly think I wouldn't have gotten the career I have without that struggle and the curiosity FOSS provided that drove me to push through and learn something.
_fw|1 year ago
And ndiswrapper… I haven’t read that word in SO long!
ckrailo|1 year ago
znpy|1 year ago
Ah, those are fond memories. I had a similar experience with my first laptop when i was 13 or 14... Suddenly the new Ubuntu release (6.06? 6.10?) shipped with better drivers (nv?) and my display was correctly recognized as 1280x800 where as previously it was driven at 1024x764.
Felt like magic :)
Oh, to be young again...
CoolCold|1 year ago
kennysoona|1 year ago
yjftsjthsd-h|1 year ago
Today Ubuntu has a poor reputation in some of the userbase. Back then, it was much more universally liked.
frantathefranta|1 year ago
trelane|1 year ago
Well, let's look at your statements:
> Windows 7 was objectively the best Windows, and Ubuntu is considered by many to be one of the worst distros.
You have two statements: one about the distribution of "goodness" as a function of Windows versions, and another about the distribution of "goodness" as a function of Linux distros.
So, logically, the question to answer if we want to get at your question is: how does the distribution of "goodness" compare across Linux and Windows?
Perhaps their answer might differ from yours. :)
znpy|1 year ago
Linux was just snappier, quicker. Like, noticeably so.
And it was also way cooler. I don't use windows nowadays, but at the time the GNU/Linux desktop was lightyears ahead. Compiz, beryl and all the crazy 3d madness of the time were just cool. It was an exciting time to use GNU/Linux on the desktop, and Canonical was a visionary company.
Such times have not come back so far, it all looks so dull and dead right now when compared to those times.
dsego|1 year ago
p_ing|1 year ago
...who doesn't like rebooting when re-IP'ing an interface?!
Or maybe 2000...
...because the dropshadow cursor rocked!
(And Slackware on the Linux side)
There will never be a 'best' OS. They're all constantly improving in one way or another. Whether you appreciate the improvement or not, that's subjective.
hnlmorg|1 year ago
I don’t think you understand what objectively means.
When it comes to things like this, it almost always boils down to personal preference. Which is subjective not objective.