(no title)
rupi
|
1 year ago
The easiest way to solve this is to salary rank the H1B applicants. Those with the highest salaries get picked; not the ‘lucky ones’ that get through a lottery, which puts a PhD from MIT and a new hire at Tata from a no name school in India on equal footing. And I say this as someone who was on H1B. The current system benefits no one but these visa mills.Edit: for grammar
PedroBatista|1 year ago
It would complicate some of these "games", but I'm sure they would implement a kickback system where the person would receive a great salary but it had a "side contract" where it would be required to pay most of it to another company, or just straight up fraud..
lolinder|1 year ago
* Does compliance with the law create the behavior we want or does the law itself incentivize bad behavior?
* Can we reasonably detect a large enough percentage of fraud that the distortion to the system will be minimal?
On the second point, see patio11's The optimal amount of fraud is non-zero [0].
People better qualified than I am should analyze anything before we implement it, but at face value I'd guess that OP's proposal stands a good chance of being much better at both metrics than the current system (which is hardly fraud-free).
[0] https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/optimal-amount-of-fra...
myrmidon|1 year ago
The main appeal of H1B abuse is cost effectiveness. If you ruin that by forcing competitive salaries (to even get the H1B in the first place), then that ruins the whole point (and companies are going to engage less in it, i.e. only when needed/"intended").
There is also a huge difference between dealing with a consultancy agency that you suspect engages in "creative visa workarounds" and straight up comitting fraud (=> higher risk, possibly even personal, makes for a much stronger incentive).
Retric|1 year ago
As such, if only one applicant for underwater welding is submitted the industry likely doesn’t require extra workers even if you’re willing to pay 500k/year. I’d still weight things so people paid 5x as much have 5x as likely to be picked which would discourage company’s submitting hundreds of applications for lower wage jobs.
PS: These were L-1A applications not H1B. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-1_visa
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
This isn’t a story about H1-Bs. Changing H1-B rules won’t do anything about L-1A abuse.
n290184|1 year ago
cuteboy19|1 year ago
shagie|1 year ago
While we're often focused on technology careers here, this approach puts the new hire at Tata on uneven footing with the French teacher.
newsclues|1 year ago
YetAnotherNick|1 year ago
aleph_minus_one|1 year ago
If this is true, the supply of such people should be reduced (i.e. don't hand out H1B visas to them), so that by the laws of supply and demand the salaries increase for them.
lazide|1 year ago
jasdi|1 year ago
bongoman42|1 year ago
apwell23|1 year ago
rebuttal to this is that, all the visas will get gobbled up by big tech in this scheme starving out startups, hospitals , chefs ect.
mrtksn|1 year ago
Do you know how do they game the minimum salary requirements? They pay the worker the minimum and then the worker pays back the difference over the actual salary they agreed. Depending on the jurisdiction the implementation will change.
myrmidon|1 year ago
That is simply not going to happen in the current political climate (and not under the next government either).
The whole problem from the local workers perspective is that H1B abuse depresses local wages because they now have to compete with other workers from poorer countries; eliminating bureaucracy, government provided job training or UBI does nothing to solve that problem.
suraci|1 year ago
You are trying to kill the reason make it exist