top | item 43089411 (no title) ritz_labringue | 1 year ago It's not on par with o1, let alone o1-pro discuss order hn newest csomar|1 year ago It's on par/better/worse depending on the problem. o1 is significantly worse, for example, in Rust programming than Claude 3.5; at least for me. gopher_space|1 year ago Claude really likes producing code, that’s for sure. I feel like it’s a useful tool once I’ve deconstructed a project past a certain point. nwienert|1 year ago It’s pretty on par with o1, better at many coding questions. flir|1 year ago I found it better at reasoning, worse at coding.Not doubting your experience, just thinking how subjective it all is.
csomar|1 year ago It's on par/better/worse depending on the problem. o1 is significantly worse, for example, in Rust programming than Claude 3.5; at least for me. gopher_space|1 year ago Claude really likes producing code, that’s for sure. I feel like it’s a useful tool once I’ve deconstructed a project past a certain point.
gopher_space|1 year ago Claude really likes producing code, that’s for sure. I feel like it’s a useful tool once I’ve deconstructed a project past a certain point.
nwienert|1 year ago It’s pretty on par with o1, better at many coding questions. flir|1 year ago I found it better at reasoning, worse at coding.Not doubting your experience, just thinking how subjective it all is.
flir|1 year ago I found it better at reasoning, worse at coding.Not doubting your experience, just thinking how subjective it all is.
csomar|1 year ago
gopher_space|1 year ago
nwienert|1 year ago
flir|1 year ago
Not doubting your experience, just thinking how subjective it all is.