[Jiro]

If you read the wording of this article carefully it says that the employees were fired in error. By referring to several different firings and by juxtaposing statements, the article tries to give the impression that Trump's rules demanded that they be fired and that Trump then had to change his mind, but it doesn't say that. Don't believe it when articles insinuate more than they actually say.

[johnnyanmac]

>the employees were fired in error.

Gee, almost like there should be a process to fire public employees instead of treating it like a private business.

They did this multiple times with other adminsitrations (the DoE as an example) so I'm not giving the benefit of the doubt.

[watwut]

Your argument amounts to "they were different kind of harmful and incompetent then you assume".

If you fired necessary people in error, you are the incompetent one doing damaging firings. No one has the duty to pretend it was something better.

Obviously Trump personally did not changed opinion, people executing his policy under his terms made predictably bad firing.