top | item 43101489 (no title) XzAeRosho | 1 year ago If things felt corrupt before, why not improve the processes? Why keep doing the same but with the companies the administration in turn likes the best? discuss order hn newest gitfan86|1 year ago Removing the process is the improvement. This is what we voted for. Less processes not more and actual results.Ask ChatGPT to compare and contrast Kamala Harris's effectiveness as "broadband Tzar" as compared to SpaceX Starlink. sjsdaiuasgdia|1 year ago Less process creates transparency gaps which become opportunities for more corruption. load replies (1) longtimelistnr|1 year ago Got it, so frame the question using language hinting i'm looking for an anti Harris response. load replies (1)
gitfan86|1 year ago Removing the process is the improvement. This is what we voted for. Less processes not more and actual results.Ask ChatGPT to compare and contrast Kamala Harris's effectiveness as "broadband Tzar" as compared to SpaceX Starlink. sjsdaiuasgdia|1 year ago Less process creates transparency gaps which become opportunities for more corruption. load replies (1) longtimelistnr|1 year ago Got it, so frame the question using language hinting i'm looking for an anti Harris response. load replies (1)
sjsdaiuasgdia|1 year ago Less process creates transparency gaps which become opportunities for more corruption. load replies (1)
longtimelistnr|1 year ago Got it, so frame the question using language hinting i'm looking for an anti Harris response. load replies (1)
gitfan86|1 year ago
Ask ChatGPT to compare and contrast Kamala Harris's effectiveness as "broadband Tzar" as compared to SpaceX Starlink.
sjsdaiuasgdia|1 year ago
longtimelistnr|1 year ago