top | item 43125077 (no title) deyiao | 1 year ago But the fact that they were donating huge sums every year even when they were still unknown really says something. If they were purely profit-driven, there’s no way the shareholders would have allowed that. discuss order hn newest wiether|1 year ago > the fact that they were donating huge sums every year even when they were still unknown really says somethingYou don't need to be known by the general public to take advantage of tax schemes involving "donating" money anticensor|1 year ago [flagged] GTP|1 year ago I have a more practical view: there's nothing wrong in making profit, the important thing is that they are also doing some good. load replies (1) brookst|1 year ago It’s an interesting reformulation of Catholic “original sin”. tw1984|1 year ago still way better than ClosedAI load replies (1)
wiether|1 year ago > the fact that they were donating huge sums every year even when they were still unknown really says somethingYou don't need to be known by the general public to take advantage of tax schemes involving "donating" money
anticensor|1 year ago [flagged] GTP|1 year ago I have a more practical view: there's nothing wrong in making profit, the important thing is that they are also doing some good. load replies (1) brookst|1 year ago It’s an interesting reformulation of Catholic “original sin”. tw1984|1 year ago still way better than ClosedAI load replies (1)
GTP|1 year ago I have a more practical view: there's nothing wrong in making profit, the important thing is that they are also doing some good. load replies (1)
wiether|1 year ago
You don't need to be known by the general public to take advantage of tax schemes involving "donating" money
anticensor|1 year ago
GTP|1 year ago
brookst|1 year ago
tw1984|1 year ago