top | item 43134105 (no title) morgante | 1 year ago That's not true.Look at USAID: they canceled everything, but there was a significant outcry about PEPFAR specifically. Now PEPFAR is back, and likely to stay. discuss order hn newest kevingadd|1 year ago I sincerely don't understand what this proves. You're citing an example of them making a bad cut and having to reverse it. What part of that is an improvement? glitch003|1 year ago we get the whole US AID budget back, aside from PEPFAR. it's a good example of a case where they cut too much and undid some cuts. load replies (1) incidentist|1 year ago As far as I can tell, they made an exception for pepfar but its funds are still frozen, due either to malice or incompetence. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/05/health/trump-usaid-pepfar...
kevingadd|1 year ago I sincerely don't understand what this proves. You're citing an example of them making a bad cut and having to reverse it. What part of that is an improvement? glitch003|1 year ago we get the whole US AID budget back, aside from PEPFAR. it's a good example of a case where they cut too much and undid some cuts. load replies (1)
glitch003|1 year ago we get the whole US AID budget back, aside from PEPFAR. it's a good example of a case where they cut too much and undid some cuts. load replies (1)
incidentist|1 year ago As far as I can tell, they made an exception for pepfar but its funds are still frozen, due either to malice or incompetence. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/05/health/trump-usaid-pepfar...
kevingadd|1 year ago
glitch003|1 year ago
incidentist|1 year ago