“The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.”
My understanding is that the text of the notice can only be changed with consent of the original copyright holders, since they are the only ones not themselves bound by the license.
im not an lawyer, but his rights were definitly violated. If you create something, then under German law there is the so Called "Urheber" who cannot give up rights. So copyleft licenses need to be rewritten to accomodate this.
Additionally they cut out the text of the license, without an reference wat the license means. I don't think that is completly OK. Most write an link to an source url if they don't want to enter a full license text.
I’m all for correct attribution, but I’m curious if the author ever bothered asking the maintainers normally before going in guns blazing with legal threats.
This is the same person who bombed users with infinite loops and other bullshit in two libraries people depended on. My heart bleeds lumpy custard for his plight. This is just a small karmic return, buddy. Perhaps you should get off your high horse and crawl back under the rock you emerged from.
I loved and promoted fakerjs, only to have the rug pulled to suit his own needs. The anti-comminity movement, imo, invalidates his claims to attribution. Does he really think he's the only one who can write random value generators? Pfft.mobe along, nothing to see here but bloviation.
joshstrange|1 year ago
“This whole license is null and void if the creator acted like a dick”
slater|1 year ago
layer8|1 year ago
My understanding is that the text of the notice can only be changed with consent of the original copyright holders, since they are the only ones not themselves bound by the license.
BoredPositron|1 year ago
I would probably just add him back with a little addendum :>
stop50|1 year ago
Additionally they cut out the text of the license, without an reference wat the license means. I don't think that is completly OK. Most write an link to an source url if they don't want to enter a full license text.
ayuhito|1 year ago
seebeen|1 year ago
rf15|1 year ago
slater|1 year ago
https://hn.algolia.com/?q=marak
davydm|1 year ago
I loved and promoted fakerjs, only to have the rug pulled to suit his own needs. The anti-comminity movement, imo, invalidates his claims to attribution. Does he really think he's the only one who can write random value generators? Pfft.mobe along, nothing to see here but bloviation.
seebeen|1 year ago
beardyw|1 year ago
rurban|1 year ago
https://www.revenera.com/blog/software-composition-analysis/...
https://nypost.com/2020/09/16/resident-of-nyc-home-with-susp...
Better to remove his name from these libs
seebeen|1 year ago