[ObscureMind]

[flagged]

[kemotep]

You can double check everything at doge.gov it’s pretty easy to see the errors they are talking about.

[matwood]

> a less biased perspective

I agree! They sane-washed Trump for months ahead of the election. So much so they had to address it in an editorial.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/28/insider/trump-speeches-20...

[belter]

The article is very clear and references the DOGE site.

Your point seems to be that truth depends on packaging the context it’s served in.

This is a classic post-truth move:

Distracting from the substance by debating the style. It’s a diversion, not a logical argument. When truth is pushed to the background in favor of delivery, it’s no longer about facts, but about framing those facts to fit an agenda.

You're suggesting that truth's value hinges on its presentation...A classic post-truth deflection that shifts attention from substance to style. In proper logic, a fact remains true regardless of its packaging.

[turtlesdown11]

Those pesky facts!

[rvnx]

We have to find a better strategy, we should discredit the newspaper, because this article is factually correct.

[watwut]

They are not right wing enough? I guess only X post count as a proof, never someones research.