(no title)
scintill76 | 1 year ago
We’re not gaslit into thinking everything was fine with government spending, we’re angry that this is how they’re going to “fix” it.
scintill76 | 1 year ago
We’re not gaslit into thinking everything was fine with government spending, we’re angry that this is how they’re going to “fix” it.
cuuupid|1 year ago
Judging on a relative scale to past attempts and the existing 5(!) agencies with the sole purpose of auditing and reducing spending, DOGE looks amazing and has gotten farther in 1 month than everyone else combined over 20 years.
It is an immensely difficult undertaking and the bureaucracy will struggle, writhe, and set fire to everything around it before it can be put down. We should hope that DOGE is just getting started and picking up momentum rather than having settled.
cropcirclbureau|1 year ago
I think that's where we fundemtally disagree, not to mention your blindness to their stated ideological ulterior motives. Thr Project 2025 document explicitly states it's goal of ultimately replacing federal workers with its cadres that work towards to it's political project.
I'd like to be proven wrong but I have a feeling all of this will never provide any cost benefits to those that aren't the rich. Even if they somehow manage to reduce the taxes on the avg joe, a big if, the Joe will pay for it in other tangible ways. I.e. I don't think it's waste being eliminated but projects the administration disagrees or wants to privatize. Can you address these concerns?
scintill76|1 year ago
Convenient way to blame "the bureaucracy" for every problem that DOGE creates. Are you open to the possibility that DOGE will cause more problems than it fixes?
matwood|1 year ago
Burning down your house because of a leaky faucet I guess is a strategy, but not one I think we should be undertaking.
Barracoon|1 year ago