Micromanaging is not sensible oversight. It’s bad management. A $1 cap is an ignorant, arbitrary cap that seems designed to be punitive and consolidate power not save money. It will cost FAR more money in damage, late fees, early termination fees and other costs.
And your trite inclusion of “orange man” to every post as a method to diminish the op argument betrays your clear bias.
Do you read PR statements like that and just assume they are true? Serious question. Is this how you process information from the world, and does it typically work well for you?
Is it "sensible oversight" to shoot first and ask questions later—to shut down all payments on a whim and then implement a review process (assuming it actually exists) afterwards which will be immediately overloaded?
You might as well starve prisoners and then say sensible calorie management is not in and of itself foolish.
digitaltrees|1 year ago
And your trite inclusion of “orange man” to every post as a method to diminish the op argument betrays your clear bias.
lostdog|1 year ago
rfw300|1 year ago
You might as well starve prisoners and then say sensible calorie management is not in and of itself foolish.
late2part|1 year ago
[deleted]
amluto|1 year ago