top | item 43174586 (no title) tkone | 1 year ago Why not just use pouchdb? It's pretty battle-tested, syncs with couchdb if you want a path to a more robust backend?edit: https://pouchdb.com/ discuss order hn newest ofriw|1 year ago Scale really. GoatDB easily handles hundreds of thousands of items being edited in realtime by multiple users CyberDildonics|1 year ago Hundreds of thousands of items and multiple users could be done on a $5 PI zero 2 w (1Ghz quad-core A53) with the C++ standard libary and a mutex.People were working at this scale 30 years ago on 486 web servers. load replies (2) tkone|1 year ago so can couch/pouch? (pouch is a façade over leveldb on the backend and client-side storage in your browser)have you done benchmarks to compare the two?i know from personal experience leveldb is quite performant (it's what chrome uses internally), and the node bindings are very top notch. load replies (1) agrippanux|1 year ago But how many goats does pouchdb have? I'm betting 0. tkone|1 year ago you can fit a lot of goats into a pouch, depending on the size of the pouch load replies (1) greenheadedduck|1 year ago [deleted] unknown|1 year ago [deleted] usuck10999|1 year ago [deleted] creshal|1 year ago You can do whatever you want, but if you reach out to other people because you want them to use it, you better be able to convince them why
ofriw|1 year ago Scale really. GoatDB easily handles hundreds of thousands of items being edited in realtime by multiple users CyberDildonics|1 year ago Hundreds of thousands of items and multiple users could be done on a $5 PI zero 2 w (1Ghz quad-core A53) with the C++ standard libary and a mutex.People were working at this scale 30 years ago on 486 web servers. load replies (2) tkone|1 year ago so can couch/pouch? (pouch is a façade over leveldb on the backend and client-side storage in your browser)have you done benchmarks to compare the two?i know from personal experience leveldb is quite performant (it's what chrome uses internally), and the node bindings are very top notch. load replies (1)
CyberDildonics|1 year ago Hundreds of thousands of items and multiple users could be done on a $5 PI zero 2 w (1Ghz quad-core A53) with the C++ standard libary and a mutex.People were working at this scale 30 years ago on 486 web servers. load replies (2)
tkone|1 year ago so can couch/pouch? (pouch is a façade over leveldb on the backend and client-side storage in your browser)have you done benchmarks to compare the two?i know from personal experience leveldb is quite performant (it's what chrome uses internally), and the node bindings are very top notch. load replies (1)
agrippanux|1 year ago But how many goats does pouchdb have? I'm betting 0. tkone|1 year ago you can fit a lot of goats into a pouch, depending on the size of the pouch load replies (1) greenheadedduck|1 year ago [deleted]
tkone|1 year ago you can fit a lot of goats into a pouch, depending on the size of the pouch load replies (1)
usuck10999|1 year ago [deleted] creshal|1 year ago You can do whatever you want, but if you reach out to other people because you want them to use it, you better be able to convince them why
creshal|1 year ago You can do whatever you want, but if you reach out to other people because you want them to use it, you better be able to convince them why
ofriw|1 year ago
CyberDildonics|1 year ago
People were working at this scale 30 years ago on 486 web servers.
tkone|1 year ago
have you done benchmarks to compare the two?
i know from personal experience leveldb is quite performant (it's what chrome uses internally), and the node bindings are very top notch.
agrippanux|1 year ago
tkone|1 year ago
greenheadedduck|1 year ago
[deleted]
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
usuck10999|1 year ago
[deleted]
creshal|1 year ago