top | item 43180133

Y Combinator deletes posts after a startup's demo goes viral

315 points| booleanbetrayal | 1 year ago |techcrunch.com

127 comments

order

dang|1 year ago

Recent and related:

'Hey Number 17 ' - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43175023 - Feb 2025 (122 comments)

Tell HN: Y Combinator backing AI company to abuse factory workers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43170850 - Feb 2025 (160 comments)

wewewedxfgdf|1 year ago

That dang is here dispels the conspiracy that this is being hidden by YC.

I'd be interested to know what he original pitch to YC was by this company.

YC companies often pivot - it may be that their initial pitch was not this at all.

duxup|1 year ago

Nothing about YC seems to imply they care about worker conditions…

Not saying I support this product, the demo is some horrific soulless behavior, but I’m not surprised either.

theobeers|1 year ago

Watching that video made me wonder whether I should even feel comfortable visiting HN.

duxup|1 year ago

I don’t think HN really generates anything for them.

roflyear|1 year ago

Bro, what? Of course you shouldn't. There are a lot of powerful influence on HN in a lot of different ways.

walrus01|1 year ago

At least Slashdot's participation in modern late stage capitalism was restricted to like, selling banner ads to RedHat, and selling mugs and t-shirts. YC is a whole other ball game.

kordlessagain|1 year ago

Wondering is just a visceral reaction to the possible harms that come with all technologies. As with most gut feelings, it’ll soon be forgotten once that cool new shiny doohickey is announced, with a price point of $599.

LarsAlereon|1 year ago

What even is the the point of VC vetting if companies like this make it through?

prododev|1 year ago

What do you think the purpose of VC vetting is? It's right there in the name: Capital. You know the thing they optimize for is capital, right?

bediger4000|1 year ago

Making even more money?

7e|1 year ago

YC doesn’t vet. It’s a sweatshop for startups. They need volume. For this reason, YC cohorts have always been full of wankers. Er, “wantrepreneurs”.

ori_b|1 year ago

What do you think VCs are vetting for?

(Hint, it's potential for profit, not ethics.)

phonon|1 year ago

Even "Taylorism" wasn't this bad...it at least tried to analyze conditions that were constraining worker productivity. This just measures output and manages by pressure and belittlement.

lmm|1 year ago

> This just measures output

Not even that. Measuring output makes a certain amount of sense. This just measures "looking busy". It's practically an admission that they don't care about actual production, they just enjoy hassling people.

UltraSane|1 year ago

This is like when I worked at UPS loading trucks over the summer and they recorded how many packages I scanned in 15 minute intervals and I was slower than they wanted. It sucked.

blindriver|1 year ago

These guys spent a lot of effort making a really great implementation of sweatshop software. These two privileged kids really thought it was a great idea and honestly didn't think there was anything wrong about this at all. Objectively they did a great job from a technological perspective.

The fact it didn't cross their minds that maybe this is a bad idea to release in the US really shows the cultural difference between the West and other countries like India. There are plenty of things wrong with the US but blatant treating of lesser-privileged people like animals is something that isn't well tolerated here.

ojbyrne|1 year ago

I would hazard a guess that plenty of US companies (start with Amazon warehouses, move on to truck drivers) do very similar things, if not exactly the same.

UltraSane|1 year ago

I've noticed this in interactions between high caste and low cast Indians at my job. Many High caste Indians have a level of arrogance towards low cast Indians that would make a Goa'uld system lord embarrassed. They truly feel entitled to their subservience and cheap labor. It is remarkable. I'm not sure if anyone born and raised in the US has the same degree of entitlement. You would have to go back to slave plantation owners in the US South.

duxup|1 year ago

> Objectively they did a great job from a technological perspective.

It’s not clear to me that their software, actually does what it says… I feel like that wasn’t entirely clear from the demo. It’s not like a short demo proves much.

unclebucknasty|1 year ago

>The fact it didn't cross their minds that maybe this is a bad idea to release in the US really shows the cultural difference

They're YC-backed. Was there no one to advise them on the "cultural difference"?

alienthrowaway|1 year ago

> The fact it didn't cross their minds that maybe this is a bad idea to release in the US really shows the cultural difference between the West and other countries like India. There are plenty of things wrong with the US but blatant treating of lesser-privileged people like animals is something that isn't well tolerated here.

McDonalds and Amazon are American companies that micromanage workers - the only difference is that their software is inhouse. The next time you're at any fast-food drive through, have a look at the monitors they have up, you'll likely see a timer and stats about rate they are serving customers.

More broadly, Hell, mouse-jigglers became a thing, and most American retail outlets won't let their cashiers sit (no chairs!) - talk about treating workers like animals.

shalmanese|1 year ago

> These guys spent a lot of effort making a really great implementation of sweatshop software.

This is such a fallacy of "If it is evil, it must be competent". Did you actually look at the software? In no universe can you confidently infer that it's a "really great implementation", it's childish at best. You're just assuming it so you can make the rest of your argument.

dns_snek|1 year ago

> There are plenty of things wrong with the US but blatant treating of lesser-privileged people like animals is something that isn't well tolerated here.

Eh, that's flattering, but there are many ways of treating lesser privileged people like animals that are socially acceptable in the US, e.g. homelessness, prison slave labor, healthcare, immigrants, the whole "tough on crime" schtick, just off the top of my head.

windex|1 year ago

AI enforced slavery. I remember reading a short story where workers get instructions from an AI constantly after starting out as work assistance. Don't remember the details.

svnt|1 year ago

There is nothing AI about that demo though? It is just humans talking on the phone looking at an mvp dashboard of basic productivity metrics. In serious logistics/ manufacturing better stuff than this is already in place.

e.g this article from six years ago about Amazon’s practices then: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/25/18516004/amazon-warehouse...

readthenotes1|1 year ago

It's not slavery. There's enough of that around without making stuff up

laidoffamazon|1 year ago

Aside from the mildly disturbing tone of the video, I thought it was amusing/interesting that both of them were born into families that owned factories and got into Duke. What a world of people that get into YC.

odo1242|1 year ago

Not gonna lie the tone of that product pitch sounded straight out of a certain mobile game ad.

What do you mean you’ve been working all day? I've got over 500 million power in “Rise of Kingdoms” and

booleanbetrayal|1 year ago

My win-win-ism: "Helping employees meet their full potential!"

duxup|1 year ago

“ No one exceeds their potential. If they did, it would mean we did not accurately gauge their potential in the first place.”

-GATTACA

drweevil|1 year ago

While still paying then peanuts.

WD-42|1 year ago

I really hope that this was just a crappy mockup that the founders didn't spend any actual time on.

Because if it is a fully fledged product, I'm not sure what that says about the many people at YC and elsewhere that gave it a pass. Seriously wtf material.

NoRagrets|1 year ago

It’s not a cultural thing. It happens here too. Someone created something like this to track strawberry pickers and their ‘productivity’.

Remember they are not even paid minimum wage by the hour. They are paid by how many punnets they pick. And this founder thought it was a great idea.

American Ag is more exploitative than any third world/developing country because the really desperate work here. It is sorely in need of automation.

Nobody wants to actually invest in Ag automation..not really…there is a lot of BS floating but everything grown locally and on our shelves relies on low paid manual labour.

I wish.. so very much..that Americans see how their food is grown.

_DeadFred_|1 year ago

I grew up in Santa Cruz county. I went to school with field workers' kids. I don't know about the ones that were migrants as we didn't keep in touch, but the ones I went to school with year after year almost all went military then college. None went on to be field workers. American ag might suck, but like you said it at least comes with something more, some future hope, if only for your kids.

prododev|1 year ago

Anyone who would fund or build this is, in my mind, taxonomically evil. Maybe not irretrievably so, but YC would need to do a lot of work in my mind to not be "that form that believes the panopticon and dehumanization is good."

This isn't just run of the mill capitalism bad, this is truly exceptionally vile and staining.

strken|1 year ago

Probably depends what the pitch was. "Monitor assembly lines using AI so you can tell when a machine breaks" is radically different from "constantly snitch on all your factory workers".

GuinansEyebrows|1 year ago

> This isn't just run of the mill capitalism bad, this is truly exceptionally vile and staining.

My friend, they’re one and the same.

georgemcbay|1 year ago

2025 tech industry try not to be the bad guys in a dystopian Sci-Fi story

Challenge: Impossible

pigeons|1 year ago

Please fund my torment nexus.

mikhael|1 year ago

so, we don't yet have AI good enough to do real work, but we do have AI good enough to punish people for not doing work.

xyzal|1 year ago

We need an alternative platform

snowe2010|1 year ago

programming.dev is a federated platform

krapp|1 year ago

Mastodon

mirawelner|1 year ago

I like lobste.rs. It gets heat from being invite only and therefore somewhat snooty but I’m a big fan

insane_dreamer|1 year ago

Will likely be bought by Amazon. Looks like a good fit for their warehouse work "culture".

xp84|1 year ago

It is interesting to me that people seem to believe that were it not for this software, no one would ever complain at workers who are, or who are though to be, slacking. As though that concept was invented by the software.

In reality this sounds to me like a play to eliminate the manager jobs, not to materially change working conditions for the rank and file, who are monitored for output one way or another, even in Western countries. Nobody employs workers unconditionally and for life.

mirawelner|1 year ago

If you are going to be funding boss spyware at least have the guts to face the backlash

rdtsc|1 year ago

Bullies always act tough but they are often weak and insecure.

Gud|1 year ago

Holy shit, this is pure evil.

”Optifye says it’s building software to help factory owners know who’s working — and who isn’t — in “real-time” thanks to AI-powered security cameras it places on assembly lines, according to its YC profile.”

mzajc|1 year ago

"At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from the classic sci-fi novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus"

_Algernon_|1 year ago

The Luddites were right. We need to learn from them to stop these kinds of practices in the cradle.

walrus01|1 year ago

the lashings will continue until morale improves

xyst|1 year ago

A startup looking to act as the equivalent of overseers on a plantation in 19th century is very representative of the American neoliberal shithole we live in.

megaloblasto|1 year ago

A truly disgusting display by everyone involved. Only a sad, sorry person would ever consider using technology like this.

lwansbrough|1 year ago

Did someone at YC watch this and think "wow, I'm in!"? lol.

ncr100|1 year ago

This kind of naive focus on technology is dehumanizing.

What are Universities doing to curb this?

alienthrowaway|1 year ago

It sounds like you want universities to instill a sense of respect for other people with a different socioeconomic background. The current administration would consider that to be "woke" or "DEI", and fine Duke the equivalent of it's endowment based on a tenuous link to the anti-affirmative-action SCOTUS ruling.

hulitu|1 year ago

Nothing ? /s

poulpy123|1 year ago

That's absolutely insane

wendyshu|1 year ago

I'm confused, what's so bad about measuring worker productivity?

tptacek|1 year ago

I wouldn't be surprised if the startup asked YC to pull the Launch after the backlash, and I would be surprised if HN was resistant to doing that. Unlike most of what runs on HN, Launch HNs (and YC company job posts) are purely a benefit for YC companies.

I wouldn't bring this particular product to market. But I think people have weird ideas about the level of intentionality that exists inside of YC with respect to its portfolio companies.

Relative to an ordinary VC fund, YC admits absurd numbers of companies every year (always has!). It deliberately admits companies that are nothing but pairs of impressive founders and an idea. Those teams get some office hours advice from some subset of YC partners, but are left alone to build their companies --- YC takes a small amount of equity, nothing resembling control. By the time Demo Day or "Launch HN" happens, many of those companies are working on totally different things from their applications.

I don't really understand why anyone would expect YC to keep a durable record of a Launch post that was working against the startup that put it together. They're not a journalism outlet, and it looks like journalism did just fine keeping a record of what happened here.

lmm|1 year ago

> I don't really understand why anyone would expect YC to keep a durable record of a Launch post that was working against the startup that put it together. They're not a journalism outlet

Is it really surprising that people might expect "Hacker News" to follow the basic standards of respectable news outlets?

tonyhart7|1 year ago

this is just surveillance with python machine learning noo??

seems like bad business since the endgame was full automation robot factory

g-b-r|1 year ago

Wet automatons can well be more convenient than real robots, for many jobs

tgsovlerkhgsel|1 year ago

I'm very glad to live in a country where something like this would be considered blatantly illegal.

meitham|1 year ago

In the UK and most of the west this is unethical but there is no explicit law that makes it illegal, curious what country you are from that deems this illegal?

overstay8930|1 year ago

Where is something like this illegal?

zombiwoof|1 year ago

[deleted]

dang|1 year ago

Whoa—of all things to add to this story, racial slurs must surely be near the bottom of the list.

No more of this please.