top | item 43188537

Tom Stevenson on the deciphering of Linear Elamite

102 points| eynsham | 1 year ago |lrb.co.uk

24 comments

order

lolc|1 year ago

You can look at the transcribed Linear Elam corpus at https://center-for-decipherment.ch/tool/#script=elam

By enabling phonetic replacement, you can read the text of these old fragments of human writing: https://center-for-decipherment.ch/tool/#script=elam&dir=LTR...

The site grew out of an independent effort to decipher Linear Elam but these days we pretty much track what Desset is publishing. The glyphs are mapped in the Unicode private use range and strings can be copied into text documents as long as you use the provided fonts.

yannis|1 year ago

Thanks for the links. I found it interesting that the site was programmed using Elm; was there any particular reason for this? Also a comment on the fonts. Although I understand it is easier to combine the fonts to include a Latin script, I prefer the Google fonts approach that they only include the specific Unicode slots for a certain script. This make it easier for publications to have consistent typography, although is a hassle to an extend. What program do researchers in the field normally use for papers? I use LuaLaTeX and easy to map macros to print the right glyph.

canjobear|1 year ago

The academic paper is here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361675439_The_Decip...

It looks convincing to me. It's exactly the same method used to decipher cuneiform, starting with proper names in certain inscriptions and then figuring out the content of other inscriptions somewhat like a crossword puzzle. The fact that one of the tablets turns out to record the syllabary in order is especially compelling.

lolc|1 year ago

Funny anecdote from a friend who worked with Linear Elam and was very skeptical of the Desset proposal: When he applied the proposed decipherment to a short inscription on a pot, it read "God condemns who takes this vase", freely translated :-)

Earlier proposals had swathes of special cases to account for inconsistencies. They were not credible. This one works!

msravi|1 year ago

Related; A cryptanalytic decipherment of the Indus Script

https://www.academia.edu/78867798/A_cryptanalytic_decipherme...

acheron|1 year ago

To be clear to others, that guy is a crank. There is no accepted decipherment of Indus Valley writing.

mcswell|1 year ago

Many have claimed to have deciphered those symbols, but it's not even clear that it is a script, in the sense of a way to write a language.

selimthegrim|1 year ago

No mention of the hypothesis about Dravidian being descended from Elamite?

cbzbc|1 year ago

Why? It's a fairly fringe theory with very little linguistic support.