top | item 43222470

(no title)

zlagen | 1 year ago

They still have 62% pass rate in WPT so my guess is that there's still a lot to do to make it usable as a browser.

discuss

order

neilv|1 year ago

Thanks. How much of the remaining missing support is necessary for pragmatic daily-driver use by computer nerds?

For what I have in mind, initially, a non-requirement is perfectly mimicking whatever someone managed to jam into a standard, unless it's really necessary to use "necessary" sites.

(Anyone who does a lot of blocking of ads/trackers will already be familiar with sites not being pixel-perfect.)

I'm thinking that bending over to mimick someone's big-moat browser behavior standards in every detail can be a secondary priority, for later, after nerds are already using it successfully as a daily driver.

Nothing says nerds can't keep a Chromium installed as an emergency backup, for trying that one demo that uses the latest thing Google-Microsoft is going to railroad into the standard, or for watching Netflix while traveling. (And for Web development testing, of course.) But otherwise, we should be dogfooding, like we had to do with Linux.

seaal|1 year ago

Seems like most nerds that are looking for an alternative browser engine are instead moving towards Ladybird.

Last year they passed Servo in WPT and recently passed Servo in stars.

As of January, Ladybird has been able to successfully render Gmail[0], so I imagine this year it will be able to solve most users daily-driver requirements.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-l8epGysffQ

worik|1 year ago

> Nothing says nerds can't keep a Chromium installed as an emergency backup,

I do, now

My boss insists on Google Meet, and it will not access audio on Firefox

Every single other website does not have this problem, dark patterns indeed

mgrandl|1 year ago

How is Ladybird so much further ahead when servo had years of commercial funding? Just different priorities?