top | item 43241589

Reintroductions of beavers into the wild in several parts of England

193 points| thinkingemote | 1 year ago |wildlifetrusts.org

149 comments

order
[+] time0ut|1 year ago|reply
I had no idea beavers were extinct in the UK. I hope they thrive.

We have a family of beavers on some property in the US. It is fascinating to watch their effect on the landscape over time. Ours cycle between an upstream and downstream habitat every few years. They allow one to regrow while they harvest the other. The area they manage is a favorite spot for many other animals including deer, various birds, coyotes, foxes, etc.

[+] DeathArrow|1 year ago|reply
It's nice to live on a property which accommodates wildife. That would be very rare in Europe. Most larger properties would be agricultural land.
[+] tcptomato|1 year ago|reply
They weren't. They were reintroduced in Scotland in 2009.
[+] mngnt|1 year ago|reply
I so don't know how to feel about beavers. I live in a country where beavers are quite strictly protected, but volves and bears are regularly hunted "to protect the people from them". This causes an imbalance: beavers have zero natural enemies, are not hunted and are capable of changing the countryside. I find myself sympathetic to the people who lose portions of their lands, I am sad for the many trees felled near a lake by my home, I understand why some people are frustrated.

In general, we messed up the ecosystem - the most complex system on this planet and we insist on messing it further by one-sided protection of the "cute" speciess.

Don't get me wrong, I admire beavers: hard workers, creative, imaginative, resilient, with strong families. All in all, a role model for humanity.

I just wish we would look at the big system and strive to fix that as a whole.

[+] pancakemouse|1 year ago|reply
The same has happened in the United Kingdom wrt deer and predators including wolves (which are locally extinct) -- a blunt instrument because we can think of no other way of protecting livestock. The result is we "have to" regularly cull thousands of animals instead of letting an ecosystem manage itself.
[+] iechoz6H|1 year ago|reply
Amusing you disparage a scientifically mandated effort to incrementally pull back from an environmental precipice as "protection of the 'cute' species".
[+] hulitu|1 year ago|reply
> I just wish we would look at the big system and strive to fix that as a whole.

This takes time and you can't score quick rewards. That's why it doesn't look good on an agenda.

[+] londons_explore|1 year ago|reply
> I just wish we would look at the big system and strive to fix that as a whole.

The only long term fix is to move all humans off earth to space/mars/moon/elsewhere, and keep the whole of earth for nature and observation only.

Everything else won't work.

The question is do we all collectively care about the environment enough to all lose our home planet? I suspect no.

[+] guax|1 year ago|reply
What's the tradeoff tho? People usually are mad because those animals threaten part of their income, not because they cause harm to the environment. It's not about beavers or wolves or beavers or another ugly animal. Is usually about beaver or corn, or soy or whatever they're planting.
[+] TriangleEdge|1 year ago|reply
"Natural England has developed a detailed licencing regime and application process to make sure that stakeholders are engaged and landowners are supported."

I don't understand what a stakeholder is in this context. Also, why are licenses involved? What does this even mean?

[+] seabass-labrax|1 year ago|reply
The stakeholders in this matter are primarily third-sector organizations in support of beaver reintroduction, of which the many regional Wildlife Trusts are most prominent, and farmers, who are generally but not entirely against reintroduction.

The licences are necessary because with such a sensitive issue, it must be ensured that only responsible and well-resourced organizations can release beavers into the wild. Otherwise, beavers may be introduced into areas that are unsuitable for them, or into areas where they will cause disproportionate damage to farming operations, and either eventuality would harm the perception of beavers. If that happened, the beavers might become so unpopular that it becomes politically impossible to continue with the reintroduction, so it's in everyone's best interests to be careful. Beavers are wonderful animals and can be very beneficial to their local environment, but you can't just dump them on a housing estate or something and expect good results.

I don't know what the exact criteria is, but the winding, damp brooks of the area where I live have been among the successful trial areas for beaver reintroduction. An abundance of willow trees is one factor that makes for an ideal beaver environment, for instance.

[+] seanw444|1 year ago|reply
> Also, why are licenses involved?

It's the UK.

(Sorry, had to.)

[+] vjk800|1 year ago|reply
A license is needed to be a beaver in England. Beavers not carrying license cards will be considered illegal aliens and returned to their country of citizenship.
[+] ashoeafoot|1 year ago|reply
you get 50€ if your tracor axle breaks because your wheel sinks into a lodge.
[+] jimnotgym|1 year ago|reply
On several UK rivers, most notably the River Wye on the Welsh/English border, there exists a powerful river trust that has raised millions to remove 'barriers to salmon migration'. They took down and bypassed weirs on tributaries. They pulled out dead trees.

Then other bodies started felling trees into their river to create habitat for juvenile fish.

As an angler you might forgive me for thinking one of those bodies was in the wrong. Either way their conservation efforts have not mitigated the collapsing stocks of salmon over the two decades of their management.

I for one am happy for the beavers to have a go instead

[+] Dylan16807|1 year ago|reply
To be clear, they pulled out isolated dead trees, that weren't part of a weir? It's hard to imagine how those could act as a migration barrier.
[+] lukas099|1 year ago|reply
I believe that the group pulling out the dead trees was wrong. A good search term for this topic, btw, is "large woody debris".
[+] onychomys|1 year ago|reply
For anybody interested in how beavers change landscapes, I can't recommend Ben Goldfarb's "Eager" highly enough. It made me a believer.
[+] acomjean|1 year ago|reply
My brother had some beavers move back into the stream near his house. I’m sure he’d happily ship them over to the UK. Knowing they’ll be more next year means he’d probably give you an annual subscription.

He doesn’t really hate the beavers, just doesn’t want them going after his pair tree, though he found a way to defend it. They’re fascinating animals.

[+] edm0nd|1 year ago|reply
They also can be pests and a nuisance.

We have some beavers that dam up parts of our property every few years which stops water from flowing to certain areas we need water in. We just throw smoke in them to make sure they abandon it and then stick some Tannerite in their dams and blow em up. Honestly, it's a pretty fun way to deal with it.

[+] zabzonk|1 year ago|reply
As my late Mum often said about hedgehogs - "I want one! Or two!". I've always planned to have back-garden pond, which might be nice for beavers, but I don't suppose I will now, due to age and not being able to look after it. Sniff.

Actually, you are not allowed to have pet European hedgehogs in the UK. Why not???

[+] justincormack|1 year ago|reply
I knew someone with a pet albino hedgehog. I thought it wS a european hedgehog but maybe not?
[+] garyclarke27|1 year ago|reply
Rewilding the UK is a great idea, especially considering that we have so little boring wildlife. Why is it so painstakingly slow, Lynx should be introduced urgently, the countryside is overrun with deer causing an unbalanced eco-system and many road traffic accidents.
[+] dboreham|1 year ago|reply
Vote for bears here. They're so cute.
[+] perdomon|1 year ago|reply
Castoreum is back on the menu, boys.
[+] Cthulhu_|1 year ago|reply
Reminds me of the (supposed) benefits of reintroducing wolves at Yellowstone; they reduced and got the elk population moving, reducing overgrazing, helping beavers recover, and helping rivers and biodiversity to recover.

https://www.yellowstone.org/wolf-project/, https://rewilding.academy/how-wolves-change-rivers/

Of course, that's Yellowstone which is a lot bigger and not populated by people. Wolves are returning (or, being allowed to return) to the Netherlands as well where they end up decimating sheep populations for the fun of it, much to the chagrin of farmers.

[+] world2vec|1 year ago|reply
Slightly off-topic but it's related to wolves.

My parents' neighbours have a huge number of goats in their property. It really is in the middle of nowhere Northern Portugal and for decades everyone always said "oh the wolves are gone, they used to be such a menace to our animals but not anymore. Barely any need for guard dogs".

However, there is a small (200~300) population of wolves and since Covid it seems they got less scared of people, or more brave and desperate because the intense forest fires have ravaged their turf. Last year they attacked the goats and killed dozens of them. It was, according to my dad, one of the goriest things he ever saw.

Guess what, the guard dogs are back, nobody says it's all a thing in the past. On one hand it's great news that wolves are making a comeback but there's always the other side.

[+] 0xbadcafebee|1 year ago|reply
Of the 800,000 sheep in the Netherlands, dogs kill 13,000 every year. There's quite a smaller wolf population than dogs.
[+] shanecleveland|1 year ago|reply
A stream in my community that had been rerouted and straightened in the name of both farming and development was recently restored to a more natural course, including its flood plains. Beavers came back quickly. Most obvious sign, beyond the dams and ponds created, are the signature pointed stumps and felled trees. Some are significant in size, and have actually fallen across trails and roads. They have fenced around some trees bordering roads, and have gone in to do see preventative trimming. Pretty cool.
[+] ChrisMarshallNY|1 year ago|reply
My mother lived in a gated community, in Maryland. They had a small lake.

Beavers used to come up from the nearby park, and dam up the lake. They'd chew down the decorative cherry trees (boo), and Bradford Pear trees (yay).

I was reading (maybe here), that beavers basically obviated a multimillion-dollar dam project, somewhere out West.

[+] hedora|1 year ago|reply
Related: While Government Officials Spent 5 Years Planning, Beavers Built their Dam for Free in 48 Hours:

https://boingboing.net/2025/02/05/while-government-officials...

Now, if we could just train beavers to build affordable housing...

[+] 0xbadcafebee|1 year ago|reply
I think you need an apex predator / mammal to solve affordable housing...

Contractors' quotes 5x higher than for private buildings? Send a brown bear to talk to 'em.

Limited government funding? Send a wild boar to budget meetings.

Restrictive zoning laws? Put a mountain lion in the room at the next zoning review.

NIMBYs don't want affordable housing? Wolves roam their neighborhood until NIMBYs agree to allow new housing.

Lengthy approval process? A honey badger asks for approval.

Economic disparity between rising housing costs and stagnant wages? Moose roams around in businesses until wages raise.

[+] trhway|1 year ago|reply
well, you can imagine that happens to the beaver who instead of building a dam insists on calling meetings and getting approvals... Natural selection so to speak.

In the human population though the natural selection (i.e. whose children are going to be more successful?) seems in the current environment to favor the strategy of hoarding resources to yourself and denying them to the others.

[+] patrick451|1 year ago|reply
>Natural England has developed a detailed licencing regime and application process to make sure that stakeholders are engaged and landowners are supported.

What a bunch of dissimulating bullshit. If they actually wanted to support landowners, they wouldn't be re-introducing this destructive species.

[+] fdb345|1 year ago|reply
Stupid idea. We're already having to kill them because of rising numbers.

England is a nation of floodplains. Its also overcrowded.

Another STUPID green fallacy.

[+] standardUser|1 year ago|reply
Did a free-flowing river write this comment?
[+] lukas099|1 year ago|reply
With beaver, flooding is more common but the severity of the worst floods is lessened.
[+] ashoeafoot|1 year ago|reply
Exon mibile sponsors this idiicy and the pocahontas crowd happily self destructs. Idealization of reality is a retardation.
[+] pawpatrolmumu|1 year ago|reply
Beavers are horrible creatures that tease, provoke and bait reactive dogs into attacking them. Some dogs may even get injured while killing them! Beavers should be banned!
[+] bloomingeek|1 year ago|reply
My goodness! Please, give us your source, I always suspected those flat tails and buck teeth were a vicissitude of some type.