[outlace]

The president can’t just unilaterally cancel a piece of legislation already signed into law. But maybe he gets the new congress to repeal it.

[mikeyouse]

That's the old way of thinking -- they're trying to do just that across the government and without some enforcement mechanism to make them send the checks, the practical result is that the President can indeed cancel pieces of legislation via impoundment.

Example 1 - Trying to take $20 billion from Citi: https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5161849-inflat...

Example 2 - The pause preempting the defunding of USAID: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/reev...

Example 3 - CHIPS act would have had funding withheld if a Federal Court hadn't stepped in, but it's unclear what enforcement mechanism can force the funding to resume: https://archive.is/BxjHw

[UncleOxidant]

Sure, but a lot of people at NIST who were in charge of implementing the CHIPS act have been fired. He definitely seems to be doing all he can to sabotage the CHIPS act without needing any congressional action.

[tensor]

He sure seems to be able to just terminate legislation signed into law. He already did it with USAID, and is in the process of doing it to many other departments.

[braincat31415]

USAID is a waste of money. Good riddance.

[scarface_74]

You know TikTok is back in App Stores with Oracle hosting content even though all of that is illegal?

Trump is ignoring the law now.

[lenerdenator]

Tell that to TikTok.

[jcranmer]

He's not constitutionally able to do so.

But DOGE has been trying to do effectively that for the past month, and has been distressingly successful at it. (For all that conservatives whined about the existence of an unaccountable deep state override elected officials making laws, that's basically an accurate description of DOGE.)

[dboreham]

Another thing that it turns out was just "guidelines".