(no title)
nwiswell | 1 year ago
The way that the figures are calculated views imports as a negative factor to GDP (because NET exports is an input to the model). Please correct me if I am wrong.
In any event, view the headline with suspicion.
nwiswell | 1 year ago
The way that the figures are calculated views imports as a negative factor to GDP (because NET exports is an input to the model). Please correct me if I am wrong.
In any event, view the headline with suspicion.
bryanlarsen|1 year ago
GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + Exports - Imports
The reason that imports are subtracted is because Consumption, Government Spending and Exports all have a domestic and imported component. So instead you could have GDP = (Domestically produced consumption) + Investment + (Government spending on domestic products) + (Domestically produced Exports) and not subtract imports.
But that's a lot harder to measure than measuring totals and subtracting imports.
827a|1 year ago
[1] https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2025/03/a-comment-on-gdpn...
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
“GDPNow is an excellent tracking model, however, the January surge in imports - especially for gold - caused the model to move negative. As the Atlanta Fed noted: ‘the contribution of net exports to first-quarter real GDP growth fell from -0.41 percentage points to -3.70 percentage points’.
Usually there would be an offsetting increase in inventories, but that is a lagging indicator. This is a short-term distortion and will balance out over the next month or so. I don't expect negative GDP in Q1.”
[1] https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2025/03/a-comment-on-gdpn...
simne|1 year ago
It will normalize in few years, may be for some markets in few months, and for some will need decades, from EU practice.