[nick-keller]

I believe it is very comparable to PGSync in the way it works (schema-based CDC), the main differences are:

- PGSync is a full-stack solution and PG-Sync is "just" a library. PGSync will work out of the box while PG-Capture will require more setup but you'll get more flexibility

- PGSync does not let you choose where you get your data from, it handles everything for you. PG-Capture lets you source events from Debezium, WAL-Listener, PG directely...

- PGSync is only meant to move data from PG to Elastic or Open-Search. While this use-case is perfectly feasible with PG-Capture, you can use it for many more things: populating cache, indexing into Algolia, sending events to an event bus...

All in all, the main difference is that PG-Capture is agnostic of the stack you want as input and output, allowing you to do pretty much anything while PGSync is focused on indexing data from PG to Elastic. I hope that clears things up!