It's really fun when your ISP starts using CG-NAT as a security feature in marketing. You ask them for a static IP and they have you sign an agreement that you won't be getting the BENEFITS of their CUSTOMER FIREWALL. Yeah ok, so if that's the language around this then we're just screwed aren't we? And you also can't tell me when you're planning to support IPv6 of course.
gruez|1 year ago
Sounds like the legal department didn't want them to get sued for "negligence" or whatever when some customer exposes their windows server 2008 installation to the internet and promptly gets hacked.