It’s a poor design. When you have 33 engines, the failure rate is 33 times higher. Although I’m not sure what’s the absolute minimum number of engines for a successful mission.
Regardless, it will go down in history as another unreliable design like the space shuttle.
I think you have it backwards, given that the stage which failed has 6 engines, and the stage that did its job and landed back on its own launch tower (inconceivable less than a decade ago) has 33 engines.
fastball|1 year ago
yakz|1 year ago
namirez|1 year ago