[cataphract]

No it isn't. Just gave some context to it (purpose) and copied into it some 250 lines of code I know has some bugs someone looking more or less closely would find and asked to evaluate its correctness. It did not find any of the problems and reported 5 supposed problems that don't exist.

[vessenes]

4.5 is not trained on code. And it shows. It is however to my eyes more fluid, thoughtful, has better theory of mind. It's like someone scaled up GPT-4, and I really like it.

[woah]

You don't know how smart OP is

[kadushka]

I give a similar task when I interview SWE candidates: about half cannot find any bugs (and sometimes see bugs where there are none), despite years of claimed experience in the language/domain.