[silvanocerza]

Not really, it was pretty clear from the investigation that some youtuber that I can't remember the name of that it wasn't just that.

One of the big claim from Honey is that it finds for you the coupons with that make you spend the least amount of money, but that's false if they have an agreement with the seller to only show you certain coupons.

So no, it doesn't affect just influencers, it affects also customers and vendors.

[jahsome]

They were still getting coupons. Thus, for 99 percent of users, it wasnt a scam; It was just another crappy product.

To anyone with a modicum of business savvy, it's not remotely surprising. You literally (don't) get what you literally (don't) pay for.

[masklinn]

The point of GP is that some of the people specifically affected (through honey replacing their codes) were influencers / streamers, who thus specifically

> could broadcast this to a lot of people.

[rzzzt]

Is it MegaLag's video that you are referring to? https://youtu.be/vc4yL3YTwWk

[silvanocerza]

Yup yup, him.

[oliwarner]

LTT certainly talked about Honey replacing other discount codes in baskets potentially making a basket more expensive, and injecting their own affiliate code when no discount was available.

It was all thoroughly scummy and against the spirit of an affiliate referral.

But I don't understand why YouTubers were so surprised. This thing is clearly generating revenue to pay off all the top shelf YouTubers and it's clearly doing that by inserting affiliate codes to generate revenue. There's no ethical explanation as to where this extra saving and Honey's revenue comes from.

[ziml77]

How was it clearly doing that? I always assumed Honey's model was to sell detailed shopping information of users.