top | item 43312290

(no title)

jchandra | 11 months ago

As for BigQuery, while it's a great tool, we faced challenges with high-volume, small queries where costs became unpredictable as it is priced per data volume scanned. Clustered tables, Materialised views helped to some extent, but they didn’t fully mitigate the overhead for our specific workloads. There are ways to overcome and optimize it for sure so i wouldn't exactly put it on GBQ or any limitations.

It’s always a trade-off, and we made the call that best fit our scale, workloads, and long-term plans

discuss

order

vivahir215|11 months ago

Hmm, Okay.

I am not sure if managing kafka connect cluster in too expensive in long term. This solution might work for you based on your needs. I would suggest to look for alternatives.

throwaway7783|11 months ago

Did you consider slots based pricing model for BQ?