Thanks for the clarification. For those of us who don't use TypeScript day to day, I feel that it is ambigious. Without clicking the link, you wouldn't know if it's about a compiler or a runtime. What if they announced a bun competitor?
Those are javascript runtimes, not TypeScript runtimes. The point stands.
If you don't know enough about TypeScript to understand that TypeScript is not a runtime, I'm not sure why you would care about TypeScript being faster (in either case).
From the title, my initial assumption was someone wrote a compiler & runtime for typescript that doesn't target javascript, which was very exciting. And I do work with typescript.
It has become a sport here to criticize titles for not explaining any random thing the commenter doesn't know. Generally these things are either in the article or they are very easily findable with a single web search.
fastball|11 months ago
If you don't know enough about TypeScript to understand that TypeScript is not a runtime, I'm not sure why you would care about TypeScript being faster (in either case).
Izkata|11 months ago
Preact was "a faster React", for example.
zem|11 months ago
alabastervlog|11 months ago
internetter|11 months ago
I mean I think generally you’d want to click the link and read the article before commenting
depr|11 months ago