> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.
They might be too common to be interesting, but if we can't call them out they will never stop. And the fact that people still do this ridicilous stuff is newsworthy of it's own don't you think?
There should be a special place in hell for devs that do this. Trying to rank it in dev hell for ad tech/tracking devs and user hostile JS devs, and I think they are just two ballrooms on the same floor
I wish I had been on the committee when this change the browser API was proposed. I would obviously gotten kicked out for asking "just what the hell do you think people are going to do with this?". But at least I'd be somewhat infamous for asking the question when seemingly no one else was willing to.
Equating a frustrating anti-pattern of websites with medical equipment failure is extremely disingenuous. An infusion pump failure can harm a person, and according to the article, has seriously injured at least on person. Hijacking the back button isn't going to physically harm someone.
Well excuse me for being extremely disingenuous then. But the no harm argument is arguable incorrect, I myself might get a heart attack some day because of a dark pattern given how infuriating those things can be.
kelnos|11 months ago
(https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html)
BurnGpuBurn|11 months ago
dylan604|11 months ago
sidewndr46|11 months ago
varikin|11 months ago
BurnGpuBurn|11 months ago