top | item 43354111

(no title)

timkam | 11 months ago

The historic reality begs to differ: Sweden covers large parts of the traditional homelands of non-Swedish people. Current reality differs as well, obviously. No matter how you twist it and turn it, the argument can only make sense for a hypothetical, geographically smaller Sweden that does not exist.

discuss

order

marcusverus|11 months ago

> Sweden covers large parts of the traditional homelands of non-Swedish people.

How does this lead to the conclusion that Swedish ethno-nationalism is bad?

timkam|11 months ago

In the ethno-nationalistic sense, Sweden is not a nation state. In its current reality, Sweden is ethnically diverse and it (partially) covers the homelands of several peoples/"nations" in the ethno-nationalistic sense. The latter issue could, e.g., be solved by giving up most of what the Swedes in the South call Norrland. This would deplete "Sweden" of natural resources and make it even more dependent on high-skilled immigration to ensure that at least the tech industry industry in the somewhat larger cities keeps running.

zaphirplane|11 months ago

They as others are making the point that racism is bad, you keep justifying it because Swedish people are white