top | item 43373715

(no title)

ttpphd | 11 months ago

If LLMs were good at summarization, this wouldn't be necessary. Turns out a stochastic model of language is not a summary in the way humans think of summaries. Thus all this extra faff.

discuss

order

sroussey|11 months ago

What are the good models for summarization? I have found all, particularly local models, to be poor. Is there a leaderboard for summarization somewhere?

rafaelmn|11 months ago

How do you evaluate quality ? Also I suspect the performance between models would varry between datasets. Heck it would vary on same model/source if you included that your mother was being held hostage and will be killed unless you summarize the source correctly :).

I think you are still stuck with try if it works for you and hope it generalizes beyond your evaluation.