[dmortin]

[flagged]

[randomNumber7]

I would say for most use cases it doesnt matter if I can talk withit about what happend somewhere in china more than 30 years ago.

Also the deepseek-R1 is pretty low censored. It was shown that some of the censorship is in the frontend. Here on hackernews was an article for example where someone talked with the model in hexadecimal ascii numbers (if i remember correct) and it happily talked about tianmen etc...

[TechTechTech]

The model is openly distributed, enabling others to improve it. Currently there are numerous uncensored and improved versions of Deepseek r1 out there already.

This community effect of improving models is why in my opinion the best LLMs will soon all be open.

[ein0p]

How is that different from American models though? Other than the polarity of propaganda, I mean.

[viccis]

It's not, but a lot of fish don't realize they're swimming in water.

[mirekrusin]

But it's open with open research papers and auxiliary tooling etc. THE GOOD states can fine tune it with hatered, isolation and warmongering – they show how to do it in cost effective way.