top | item 43398823

(no title)

heftig | 11 months ago

I think the implication was that they're pointers to objects that own resources (like containing FILE handles) and need to be "freed" with a custom function, not just "free".

    void my_thing_free(MyThing *thing) {
        fclose(thing->file);
        free(thing);
    }
assuming an associated "my_thing_new" that only returns a valid pointer when both the allocation and the fopen succeeded.

discuss

order

No comments yet.