top | item 43399196 Java 24 Released 48 points| mkurz | 11 months ago |mail.openjdk.org 5 comments order hn newest ChrisArchitect|11 months ago Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43398999 bberrry|11 months ago Finally I can recommend virtual threads without significant caveats. madduci|11 months ago Out of all of the changes, I find> Permanently Disable the Security ManagerKind of blocker for many companies to move to Java 24 waste_monk|11 months ago Have you read the JEP [1]? They're confident that removing it won't cause any real harm because practically no one is using it, and there's been almost no community push-back since it since it was deprecated in Java 17 (3-ish years ago).[1] https://openjdk.org/jeps/486 java-man|11 months ago SecurityManager followed Applets.Why is it a blocker? What is your use case?
madduci|11 months ago Out of all of the changes, I find> Permanently Disable the Security ManagerKind of blocker for many companies to move to Java 24 waste_monk|11 months ago Have you read the JEP [1]? They're confident that removing it won't cause any real harm because practically no one is using it, and there's been almost no community push-back since it since it was deprecated in Java 17 (3-ish years ago).[1] https://openjdk.org/jeps/486 java-man|11 months ago SecurityManager followed Applets.Why is it a blocker? What is your use case?
waste_monk|11 months ago Have you read the JEP [1]? They're confident that removing it won't cause any real harm because practically no one is using it, and there's been almost no community push-back since it since it was deprecated in Java 17 (3-ish years ago).[1] https://openjdk.org/jeps/486
ChrisArchitect|11 months ago
bberrry|11 months ago
madduci|11 months ago
> Permanently Disable the Security Manager
Kind of blocker for many companies to move to Java 24
waste_monk|11 months ago
[1] https://openjdk.org/jeps/486
java-man|11 months ago
Why is it a blocker? What is your use case?