top | item 43403199

(no title)

kopecs | 11 months ago

As a matter of law? Sure it does. Thaler said the image at issue was "autonomously created by a computer algorithm running on a machine". He's been trying to walk that back for the last couple of years though. See Thaler v. Perlmutter, 1:22-cv01564-BAH (ECF #24), D.D.C. (Aug. 18, 2023).

discuss

order

visarga|11 months ago

How about selection? If I select the good image from 1000 others? Curation is also a contribution to art.

dragonwriter|11 months ago

The argument about whether human selection would make the human the author of the work is irrelevant, because the human in this case isn't claiming authorship, by selection or otherwise.

ZeroTalent|11 months ago

I would say curation and editing are much more important than creating the art itself, but that might be a very unpopular opinion.